Forensic scientists respond to crime scenes round the clock. They handle critical evidence under pressure. Police receive a 13th month salary for the same duty obligation. Forensic professionals receive nothing. This is the unfiltered policy gap no one is talking about.
The 13th month salary, as it is commonly known in Indian policing, is the cash compensation awarded to police personnel — from Constable to Inspector — in lieu of their 30 earned leaves per year. In practice, police cannot take these leaves because they are required to remain on duty round the clock. The leave is encashed instead.
The real weight of this benefit emerged publicly in Punjab in 2020, when the state Finance Department proposed scrapping it to save ₹312.27 crore annually across 79,625 police personnel. The response from the force was immediate and telling. A Head Constable stated directly: "The 13th month salary was a compensation for round-the-clock duty. It was not a special benefit given to us."[1]
That statement is the crux of the entire debate. This is not a bonus. It is a recognised, institutionalised acknowledgment that police work does not stop at 5 PM — and that those who serve round the clock deserve compensation for it. Forensic professionals now carry the same round-the-clock obligation. The compensation framework has not followed.
The disparity is not a matter of opinion — it is a matter of documented policy, or more precisely, the absence of one. Police personnel across India receive a structured, formal compensation framework for their round-the-clock obligation. Forensic professionals, who increasingly share those same field obligations, receive no equivalent protections.
Structured policy for round-the-clock duty obligations
Same field duty — no equivalent policy framework
Police personnel's 13th month salary is not a perk — it is compensation for leaves they cannot take because duty never stops. Under BNSS 2023, forensic professionals are now legally mandated to attend crime scenes for all serious offences. Their duty obligation is codified in law. Their compensation for that obligation remains entirely absent from policy.[2]
The table below maps every key compensation and welfare provision available to police personnel against what exists — or does not exist — for forensic professionals in India's government forensic laboratories.
| Benefit / Provision | Police Personnel | Forensic Professionals | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 13th Month Salary Leave encashment for round-the-clock duty; 30 EL/year |
✔ YES Constable to Inspector. Punjab alone covers 79,625 personnel at cost of ₹312.27 crore/year.[1] |
✘ NO No equivalent provision in any state for forensic professionals |
No Policy |
| Risk & Hardship Allowance Compensation for dangerous / field duty |
✔ YES Up to ₹17,300/month, 100% tax-free; based on Risk (R1–R3) × Hardship (H1–H3) matrix.[3] |
✘ NO Forensic professionals handling hazardous biological, chemical and ballistic evidence receive no hazard pay |
No Policy |
| Overtime / Night Duty Compensation | ✔ YES Overtime pay, night shift compensation, and duty-based incentives structured at state level.[5] |
✘ NO No institutionalised overtime or night duty compensation for forensic crime scene response in any state |
No Policy |
| Ration Money Allowance | ✔ YES ₹2,880/month for CAPF and police personnel not given free rations; revised when DA crosses 25% and 50%.[3] |
✘ NO No ration support for forensic professionals on prolonged field or night operations |
No Policy |
| Uniform / Kit Maintenance Allowance | ✔ YES ₹5,000/year (₹417/month) uniform maintenance allowance + initial kit at appointment.[3] |
✘ NO PPE, lab coats, and field protective equipment often self-procured in under-resourced state labs |
No Policy |
| Job Security / Permanence | ✔ YES Permanent government employment with DA revision, NPS/UPS pension, and defined career progression |
⚠ PARTIAL 40% sanctioned posts vacant across 26 FSLs. Contractual fill-in rate: 63% drops to 52.5% scientific fill when contractual staff excluded.[4] |
Crisis Level |
| Ministry-Level Welfare Body | ✔ YES Bureau of Police Research & Development (BPR&D) actively addresses police welfare, workload, and service conditions |
✘ NO No dedicated forensic professional welfare body or structured policy discourse at MHA level |
No Discussion |
India's new criminal laws — the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), and Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA), enacted in 2023 — made forensic science central to criminal justice reform. Section 176(3) of the BNSS now mandates that a forensic expert visit crime scenes for all offences punishable with 7 or more years of imprisonment.[2]
This is not a recommendation. This is a statutory obligation. When a serious crime occurs at 2 AM, the forensic professional must respond. The law says so. Courts are already holding states to this standard — the Kerala High Court issued a directive ordering police to comply with BNSS forensic mandates, because states were failing to meet the law's own requirements.
And yet the government invested ₹2,254.43 crore under the National Forensic Infrastructure Enhancement Scheme (NFIES) — for buildings, equipment, 7 new Central FSLs, and 9 new NFSU campuses.[6] That investment has a budget line. The welfare framework for the humans who will staff those labs and fulfil those BNSS mandates has no equivalent policy discussion.
The government created a legal mandate for round-the-clock forensic availability under BNSS 2023. It simultaneously invested ₹2,254 crore in forensic infrastructure. What it has not done is create any compensation, welfare, or duty-condition framework for the forensic professionals legally bound to be available round the clock. You cannot mandate 24/7 availability without building a 24/7 welfare framework.[6][2]
India's go-to solution for filling government forensic workforce gaps is the contractual appointment. State labs that cannot get permanent recruitment approvals hire "contractual scientific assistants" on fixed monthly salaries — with no DA revisions, no pension, no NPS contribution, and in many cases no guarantee of renewal.
The Project 39A Forensic Science India Report (2023) found this in hard numbers: of 3,211 sanctioned posts across 26 surveyed FSLs, 40% were vacant. When contractual staff are removed from the count, the proportion of filled scientific posts drops from 63% to just 52.5%.[4] Over half the forensic scientific workforce is temporary.
These contractual professionals are simultaneously being asked to fulfil statutory BNSS obligations — on temporary contracts with no job security. Gujarat FSL offered ₹31,340/month consolidated salary on contract basis in 2025. No DA. No NPS. No permanence. That is not a workforce policy. That is a round-the-clock duty mandate dressed up as an opportunity.[4]
This is not a grievance post. It is a policy brief. The following demands are specific and actionable. The Ministry of Home Affairs, state forensic directorates, and the NFSU must collectively initiate these discussions.
Forensic professionals performing round-the-clock field and lab duties must receive equivalent leave encashment as police personnel — formally recognised at state and central level.
Crime scene attendance — especially for biological, chemical, or decomposed material — carries demonstrable professional risk. A structured hazard allowance, similar to the Police Risk & Hardship Matrix, must be created for forensic field personnel.
BNSS Section 176(3) created a legal mandate for forensic crime scene attendance. The Ministry must now create a corresponding welfare, compensation, and duty-condition framework for those legally bound to fulfil that mandate.
States must commit to converting long-serving contractual forensic staff to permanent positions with pension and DA revision — or at minimum provide contractual staff enhanced consolidated pay that reflects their statutory BNSS obligations.
Just as BPR&D addresses police welfare, a dedicated forensic science welfare and service conditions body must be established under the Ministry of Home Affairs — giving forensic professionals institutional representation at the national level.
The 13th month salary debate is not about one allowance. It is a symbol of a systemic failure to recognise forensic professionals as essential duty-bound public servants — not merely technical staff who clock in and clock out.
Police personnel receive compensation for the obligation of round-the-clock availability because that obligation is real, documented, and policy-acknowledged. Forensic professionals carry the same obligation — and since the BNSS, they carry it as a legal mandate. The compensation framework has not followed.
This is not a demand for privilege. It is a demand for parity. The Ministry of Home Affairs and competent state authorities must initiate a structured policy discussion on compensation, incentives, and welfare measures for forensic professionals working tirelessly for justice.
Strong forensics delivers strong justice. But you cannot build strong forensics on a workforce that is overworked, underpaid, and unrecognised.
Share this post. Start the conversation. Demand that the Ministry of Home Affairs, state forensic directorates, and competent authorities acknowledge what the evidence has made clear for years.
#RecognizeForensicProfessionals